MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402513160

Competitive Routing on a Bounded-Degree Plane Spanner

2012· article· en· W2402513160 on OpenAlexaff
Prosenjit Bose, Rolf Fagerberg, André van Renssen, Sander Verdonschot

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersDanmarks Frie Forskningsfond
KeywordsDegree (music)Bounded functionSpannerPlane (geometry)Routing (electronic design automation)CombinatoricsComputer scienceMathematicsComputer networkPhysicsDistributed computingGeometryMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show that it is possible to route locally and com-petitively on two bounded-degree plane 6-spanners, one with maximum degree 12 and the other with maximum degree 9. Both spanners are subgraphs of the empty equilateral triangle Delaunay triangulation. First, in a weak routing model where the only information stored at each vertex is its neighbourhood, we show how to find a path between any two vertices of a 6-spanner of max-imum degree 12, such that the path has length at most 95/ √ 3 times the straight-line distance between the ver-tices. In a slightly stronger model, where in addition to the neighbourhood of each vertex, we store O(1) addi-tional information, we show how to find a path that has length at most 15/ √ 3 times the Euclidean distance both in a 6-spanner of maximum degree 12 and a 6-spanner of maximum degree 9.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207