MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402566201 · doi:10.1017/s1481803500009878

Revision of the Canadian Emergency Department Information System (CEDIS) Presenting Complaint List Version 1.1

2008· article· en· W2402566201 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eric Grafstein, Michael J. Bullard, David Warren, Bernard Unger

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalChildren's Hospital of Western OntarioUniversity of Alberta HospitalCanadian Association of Emergency PhysiciansMcGill UniversityUniversity of British ColumbiaSt. Paul's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplaintEmergency departmentComputer scienceMedical emergencyInformation retrievalMedicinePolitical scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.093
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.093
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0160.012
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations104
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency MedicineSame topicData-Driven Disease SurveillanceFrench-language works237,207