Novel outpatient approach to lower lip reanimation using a palmaris longus tendon sling.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report a new approach to lower lip reanimation, which can be performed in the outpatient clinic setting. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary and quaternary care academic hospital, Toronto. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An evaluation of nine patients with marginal mandibular nerve injury, who underwent harvest of the palmaris longus tendon and static suspension of the lower lip, was performed in the outpatient setting. Outcome measures included subjective self-evaluation of the functional and aesthetic results using the Lip Reanimation Outcomes Questionnaire and postoperative photographic grading of symmetry at rest and during three smile poses. Medical records were reviewed for demographics and complications. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of patients reported overall improvements in smiling, oral competence, and speech articulation following tendon transfer. Photographic grading by the judging panel found satisfactory smile symmetry postprocedure. CONCLUSIONS: The palmaris longus tendon sling procedure provides an effective, additional option for reanimation of the paralyzed lower lip.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".