MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2402633449

Word Learning in the Wild: What Natural Data Can Tell Us

2013· article· en· W2402633449 on OpenAlexafffund
Barend Beekhuizen, Afsaneh Fazly, Aida Nematzadeh, Suzanne Stevenson

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and dialogue systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of TorontoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsLexiconSituational ethicsNounContext (archaeology)Word (group theory)Computer scienceNatural language processingLinguisticsNatural (archaeology)Artificial intelligenceObject (grammar)Natural languagePsychologySocial psychologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a child first begins to acquire a lexicon, the sources of word-meanings must be available from the situational context.However, it has been argued that the situational availability of the meanings of relational terms, such as verbs, is lower than that of whole-object labels, such as nouns.In this paper, we present a corpus of child-directed language, paired with situational descriptions, that enables us to explore the situational availability of word-meanings using a computational learner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0130.026
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicSpeech and dialogue systemsFrench-language works237,207