Vastus lateralis muscle-only free flap: defining its role in head and neck reconstruction.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the anatomy, indications, technique, advantages, and limitations of vastus lateralis muscle-only free tissue transfer for reconstruction of head and neck defects following tumour ablation. DESIGN: A single-centre retrospective chart review was undertaken. METHODS: Patients undergoing free tissue transfer of the vastus lateralis muscle for reconstruction of head and neck defects between May 1, 2003, and April 30, 2006, were identified. Demographic data, surgical details, outcome, and complications were determined. RESULTS: Nine patients were identified. A variety of tumour types and sites were treated. Three suffered flap-related complications consisting of distal flap vascular compromise. CONCLUSIONS: The vastus lateralis muscle-only free flap has numerous advantages, including versatility, ease of harvest, and ability to perform a two-team operation. There are also some limitations, including variable anatomy and tenuous distal circulation. Judicious use of this free flap in noncritical areas is preferable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".