MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2402908027

The synergy of clinical placements.

2004· article· en· W2402908027 on OpenAlexaff
Angele Cloutier, Gail Shandro, Nina Hrycak

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyMedical educationPublic relationsMedicinePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As we move to accommodate the demands for placement and move students from a learner to a professional role, all parties in a student's clinical learning situation need to re-examine traditional ways of doing things to see if they are still the most effective. The results of placing and working with students in a way that is collaborative and more student-driven may be surprising. The benefits could well outweigh the costs in terms of long-range goals for faculty, students and agencies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0020.016
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicInnovations in Medical Education→French-language works237,207→