Le concept français d'athymhormie de 1922 à nos jours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The psychiatric concept of athymhormie (loss of vital force "élan vital" and affectivity) was developed at the beginning of the 20th century and used exclusively in France, until it was fortunately adopted by mostly French-speaking neurologists. The authors of the concept, M Dide and P Guiraud, considered the term an independent entity, an heir to dementia praecox, for which they did not like to substitute a "schizophrenia" with blurry boundaries. This term then came to mean to them, and to most French psychiatrists to this day, the basic core of psychosis' deficient forms. The word athymhormie (or loss of psychic self-activation) is now also used in neurology for the behavioural and emotional consequences of lesions caused on basal nuclei and, more widely, of a circuit associated with the limbic loop. However, the phenomenological reality of the associated disorders and the relevance of the same name can be questioned. This review concludes that although the settings--in a psychiatric or a neurologic clinic--where athymhormie takes place are very different, the choice of the same name is justified in a renewed and symptomatic neuropsychiatric approach. The objective of this approach is to explore why some symptoms, common or similar, could represent the lack of a physiological function, presumed here to be motivation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".