MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403095561 · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2569525

Optimal Energy Management for Stable Operation of an Islanded Microgrid

2016· article· en· W2403095561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Science Foundation of Shaanxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMicrogridDistributed generationControl theory (sociology)Load managementController (irrigation)AC powerEngineeringModel predictive controlEnergy managementVoltageDemand responseControl engineeringPower (physics)Computer scienceEnergy (signal processing)ElectricityControl (management)Electrical engineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a methodology on the design of an optimal predictive control scheme applied to an islanded microgrid. The controller manages the batteries energy and performs a centralized load shedding strategy to balance the load and generation within the microgrid, and to keep the stability of the voltage magnitude. A nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) algorithm is used for processing a data set composed of the batteries state of charge, the distributed energy resources (DERs) active power generation, and the forecasted load. The NMPC identifies upcoming active power unbalances and initiates automated load shedding over noncritical loads. The control strategy is tested in a medium voltage distribution system with DERs. This control strategy is assisted by a distribution monitoring system, which performs real-time monitoring of the active power generated by the DERs and the current load demand at each node of the microgrid. Significant performance improvement is achieved with the use of this control strategy over tested cases without its use. The balance between the power generated by the DERs and the load demand is maintained, while the voltage magnitude is kept within the maximum variation margin of ±5% recommended by the standard ANSI C84.1-1989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it