MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403144048 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-472-0:353

Analysis of Coenzyme Q<SUB>10</SUB> Content in Human Plasma and Other Biological Samples

2003· article· en· W2403144048 on OpenAlexaff
Scott S. Graves, Marianna Sikorska, Henryk Borowy‐Borowski, Rodney J. H. Ho, Tot Bui, C S Woodhouse

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effects
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoenzyme Q10CofactorCoenzyme Q – cytochrome c reductaseAntioxidantChemistryMitochondrionRedoxBiochemistryInorganic chemistryCytochrome c

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its discovery in 1957, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) has been extensively studied for its important role as a redox carrier in the mitochondrial electron transport chain and for its role as a potent antioxidant in animal tissues (1,2). In addition, several reports indicate that deficiencies in CoQ10 are implicated in heart disease, periodontal infections, and AIDS (3–5). These observations have generated ever-expanding needs for simple and sensitive analytical methods to assess CoQ10 content in biological materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicCoenzyme Q10 studies and effectsFrench-language works237,207