MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2403249837

Aortic valve sclerosis is associated with an echocardiographically determined thinner aortic wall.

2006· article· en· W2403249837 on OpenAlexaff
Simon W. Rabkin, John Jue, Michael Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParasternal lineCardiologyBicuspid aortic valveAortic valveInternal medicineSinus (botany)Cardiac skeletonAortic sinusAortic rootAortaBody surface area
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The aortic valve leaflets plus the aorta and sinuses of Valsalva are a functional unit that optimizes distribution of the diastolic pressure load on the aortic valve leaflets. The study aim was to examine the hypothesis that echocardiographically measured parameters of aortic wall stress at the level of the sinuses of Valsalva, namely aortic wall thickness and luminal diameter, are associated with the presence of aortic valve sclerosis (AVS). METHODS: Among 103 patients (age range 60-70 years) referred for echocardiography at a university hospital, 59 with AVS were compared to an age-matched control group (n = 44) with no echocardiographic abnormalities. Subjects with congenital bicuspid aortic valves were excluded from the study. Transthoracic echocardiographically obtained digital loop recordings were reviewed and two-dimensionally guided measurements were made at the level of the aortic annulus and sinus of Valsalva using electronic calipers, from the parasternal long-axis view. RESULTS: There was a significant linear relationship and direct correlation between aortic root diameter at the sinus of Valsalva and body surface area (BSA) (r = 0.488, F = 31.6, p < 0.001) in both the AVS (r = 0.491, F = 18.1, p < 0.001) and control (r = 0.571; F = 20.3; p < 0.001) groups. After adjusting for BSA, aortic wall thickness was significantly (p < 0.05) smaller in AVS patients compared to controls. Luminal diameter was not significantly different between the two groups. The specificity of the relationship with sinus of Valsalva wall thickness was confirmed by an absence of any difference in aortic root thickness at the level of the aortic annulus in AVS compared to controls. CONCLUSION: AVS is associated with a thinner aortic wall at the level of the sinus of Valsalva. This novel finding suggests that a thinner aortic wall, a reflection of its constituents, likely acting through its contribution to reduced aortic compliance and increased aortic stress, leads to the thickening of aortic valve leaflets characteristic of AVS. Further understanding of this relationship may unravel the pathophysiology of this type of aortic valve disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→