MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403271875 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.r236-28

Dynamic Bayesian Network Approach for Modeling Trihalomethanes from Ontario Water Supply Systems

2010· article· en· W2403271875 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Zoe Jingyu Zhu, Jeff Kroes, Edward A. McBean

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic Bayesian networkBayesian networkVariable-order Bayesian networkComputer scienceBayesian probabilitySystem dynamicsData miningArtificial intelligenceMachine learningBayesian inference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) approach is used to quantify relational knowledge for modeling relations or dependencies between variables from the dynamic system of disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation which changes over time. The DBN framework is used to assess causality between constituent parameters of water supply quality, based on data from communities in Ontario which rely on groundwater as their source of supply. The DBN models are used to assess probabilistic dimensions and to assist decision-making by identifying control options to decrease DBP formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.394
Threshold uncertainty score0.726

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Water Management ModelingSame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207