MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403380339

Cross-Language Entity Linking in Maryland during a Hurricane.

2011· article· en· W2403380339 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul McNamee, James Mayfield, Veselin Stoyanov, Douglas W. Oard, Xu Tan, Ke Wu, David Doermann

Bibliographic record

VenueTheory and applications of categories · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNatural Language Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTask (project management)Natural language processingMachine translationArtificial intelligenceTransliterationSoftwareMeasure (data warehouse)Information retrievalData miningProgramming language
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our team from the JHU HLTCOE and the University of Maryland submitted runs for all three variants of the TACKBP entity linking task. For the monolingual tasks, we essentially mirrored our HLTCOE TAC-KBP 2010 submission, making only modest changes to accommodate differences in 2011, namely the requirement to cluster NIL responses, and the change in evaluation measure. However, our work on the cross-lingual task was significantly more involved, requiring development of robust, multiphased transliteration software, use of techniques in cross-language information retrieval, and reliance on a Chinese-toEnglish statistical machine translation system. In this paper we describe our work for the 2011 evaluation and the results we obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheory and applications of categoriesSame topicNatural Language Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207