MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403470002

Antonio de Guevara y Europa

2009· book-chapter· es· W2403470002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Simón Anselmus Vosters

Bibliographic record

VenueEdiciones Universidad de Salamanca eBooks · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antonio de Guevara, predicador, cronista de Carlos V y obispo de Mondonedo, fue el autor mas leido y controtrovertido en lengua espanola en la Edad de Oro y hasta 1650. Antonio de Guevara y Europa estudia exhaustivamente la influencia que la obra de Guevara ha ejercido en Espana y en Europa hasta hoy en dia, tanto en el ambito de la erudicion como en las principales literaturas europeas, y llena un vacio importante en los estudios guevarianos. El libro de Simon A. Vosters pone de relieve el caracter fundamentalmente moralista de la obra de Guevara, cuyo buen sentido del humor estuvo casi siempre al servicio de la etica. Simon A. Vosters estudio filologia y literatura neerlandesa y espanola en la Universidad Catolica de Nimega, donde se doctoro con un trabajo sobre Espana en la literatura neerlandesa. Ha impartido clases y cursos diversos en la Universidad Estatal de Groninga y la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y es catedratico de espanol en la University British Columbia, en Vancouver (Canada). Forma parte de diversas instituciones culturales y academicas de Europa y America. Es autor de un centenar de publicaciones. Esta obra ha obtenido el Premio a la mejor monografia que otorga la Union de Editoriales Universitarias Espanolas (UNE) en 2010.Dimensiones: 24 x 17 (cm).Peso: 1.415 Kg.Numero de Paginas: 924.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdiciones Universidad de Salamanca eBooksSame topicEarly Modern Spanish LiteratureFrench-language works237,207