MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403529236 · doi:10.1159/000459256

Altered Ribonucleotide Reductase Activity inDrug-Resistant Mammalian Cells Detected by an AssayProcedure for Intact Cells

2017· article· en· W2403529236 on OpenAlexaff
Shaun E. Koropatnick

Bibliographic record

VenueEnzyme · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRibonucleotide reductaseEnzymeEnzyme assayRibonucleotideCell cultureReductaseDrugBiochemistryIn vivoSubstrate (aquarium)In vitroChemistryCellPyrimidine analogueBiologyMolecular biologyPyrimidineNucleotidePharmacology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydroxyurea, an antitumor drug which specifically inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, has been used as a selective agent to obtain single-step and double-step drug-resistant cell lines altered in reductase activity. Using an assay procedure developed for analyzing enzyme activity in intact cells a variety of novel changes in the properties of the enzyme activity was detected in the drug-resistant lines. Differences in cellular levels of enzyme activity, changes involving pyrimidine and purine substrate Km values, and altered enzyme sensitivity to hydroxyurea were found using the in vivo assay procedure. These changes could account for the drug-resistant phenotypes. The assay technique which is described in this report is easy to perform, can accurately determine enzyme activity in as few as 5 X 10(6) cells grown conveniently on the surface of a single tissue culture plate, and is a valuable quick screening method for identifying cells altered in different aspects of ribonucleotide reductase activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnzymeSame topicMetal-Catalyzed Oxygenation MechanismsFrench-language works237,207