ANALISIS KESELARASAN ANTARA PENGGUNAAN LAHAN SAAT INI DENGAN ALOKASI RUANG DAN STATUS LAHAN (STUDI KASUS KABUPATEN BOGOR BAGIAN BARAT)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pemekaran wilayah sudah banyak dilakukan dan tampaknya akan terus terjadi, seperti wacana pemekaran Kabupaten Bogor bagian Barat. Pembentukan wilayah otonomi baru memerlukan persiapan yang penting. Antara lain dalam level pemanfaatan sumberdaya fisik wilayah. Analisis keselarasan antara penggunaan lahan saat ini dengan alokasi ruang dan status lahan sangat relevan dengan rencana pemekaran suatu wilayah. Informasi yang diperoleh merupakan dasar dalam penataan ruang wilayah baru. Analisis tumpangtindih antara penggunaan lahan saat ini, alokasi ruang yang ada dan status lahan di wilayah Kabupaten Bogor bagian Barat telah dilakukan. Hasilnya menjelaskan bahwa terdapat ketidakserasian antara Kawasan Hutan Konservasi karena adanya penggunaan lahan lain selain hutan yaitu: kebun campuran, permukiman, perkebunan, pertambangan, sawah dan tegalan dengan status lahan Hak Guna Usaha dan Hak Milik. Dalam Kawasan Perkebunan status Hak Guna Usaha terdapat aktivitas masyarakat bercocok tanam. Kebun campuran hasil dari aktivitas masyarakat yang dijumpai pada seluruh alokasi ruang dan status lahan yang berbeda dengan luas yang beragam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".