MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403591517 · doi:10.1093/amt/tsv070

Control of<i>Scirtothrips dorsalis</i>(Thysanoptera: Thripidae) with Foliar Insecticides, 2011

2015· article· en· W2403591517 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vivek Kumar, Garima Kakkar, Dakshina R. Seal, Cindy L. McKenzie, Lance S. Osborne

Bibliographic record

VenueArthropod management tests · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThripidaeBiologyThripsHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several conventional and novel insecticides against a new invasive thrips pest, chilli thrips (CT), Scirtothrips dorsalis (Hood), in pepper under greenhouse condition. The trial was conducted at Tropical Research and Education Center in Homestead, FL, to find an alternative to standard effective chemistries used in thrips control. The peppers were grown in Fafard 2 Mix (Canadian Formula; Conrad Fafard, Inc., Agawam, MA) from seed in seedling trays and transplanted in 1 gal plastic pot when seedlings were 7-wk old (approximately). Plants were watered as needed (∼3 times a week) and fertilized once each week with 20 N: 20P: 20K granular fertilizer. The greenhouse was maintained at 26 ± 3°C and 75–80% RH. The trial was setup as RCB design with four replicates where treated pots were placed at 1.5 by 1.5 ft spacing. Treatments were applied as curative measure using a small hand held sprayer delivering 65.5 ml m 2 at 2.11 kPa (30.6 psi). Treatments were evaluated by carefully checking five top leaves of each pepper plant by direct count sampling method using 30x hand-held lens. Data were subjected to square root transformation prior to conducting the analysis of variance and mean separation procedure. The data presented are the untransformed means. Means separations were performed using the Tukey HSD test at P < 0.05. Overall Provado, Radiant, Sivanto, and Hachi Hachi were the most effective in controlling CT population (larvae and adults) during the course of study. All the insecticides except Belay, Coragen, and Cyazypyr provided significant reductions in the CT larval population (compared to control) on all the sampling days until 10 DAT. Actara, Assail, and Radiant showed consistent result in regulating CT larvae and provided >90% reduction until 10 DAT ( Table 1 ). Novel chemistries, such as Belay (84–100%), Hachi Hachi (88–100%), and Sivanto (74–100%), also provided effective suppression of CT larvae during the study. Coragen was found to be the least effective against CT larvae, and no significant reduction in larval population was observed on any sampling date compared to untreated control. While evaluating different treatments for CT adults, Provado provided significant suppression in adults count compared to untreated control on all the sampling dates until 10 DAT, whereas Actara, Hachi Hachi, Radiant, Sivanto, and Voliam Flexi were effective until DAT 7 ( Table 2 ). None of the insecticide treatments caused any phytotoxic effects on pepper. Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, Tukey HSD test). Henderson–Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean. Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different ( P > 0.05, Tukey HSD test). Henderson–Tilton’s corrected percent mortality is presented in parentheses after each mean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArthropod management testsSame topicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsFrench-language works237,207