Printing-houses and printing in the service of the Polish Parliament in the sixteenth century
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The date generally taken by historians to mark the beginning of the two-chamber parliament in Poland is 1493. This date coincided with the beginnings of printing in Poland, almost half a century later than in the Holy Roman Empire. However, another quarter century was to pass after the first printed materials appeared in Poland before this new technique of mass communication was applied to work in the Polish parliament. Based on literature to date (including a work by M. Cytowska, Bibliography of Government Publications in the Sixteenth Century (Wroclaw, 1961)) and his own research in the Polish historical documents section in the Stockholm archive, the author tries to show the ancillary function of printing-houses and printing in the work of the Polish parliament in the sixteenth century. He analyses printed materials: invitation forms to the seym, minutes of proceedings, tax bills and so on. The fact that parliamentary publications began to appear not only in Latin but also, from the mid-sixteenth century, in Polish, deserves attention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it