MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403634262 · doi:10.1159/000457536

Prostaglandin-Induced AntralHyperplasia in Neonates:Clinical Experience andDose-Response Characteristics

2017· article· en· W2403634262 on OpenAlexaff
M. M. Silver, Gideon Koren

Bibliographic record

VenueDevelopmental Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomaticDiscontinuationHyperplasiaAntrumCumulative doseAdverse effectToxicityGastroenterologySurgeryInternal medicineStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antral hyperplasia (AH) induced by prostaglandins (PG) has been described by us recently in 5 infants with cyanotic heart disease receiving the drug. The purpose of the present study was to analyze 14 infants diagnosed as having AH either sonographically or pathologically in an attempt to characterize the dose-response characteristics of this adverse drug reaction, its clinical course and its optimal management. Infants with AH exhibiting large gastric aspirates have received a significantly lower cumulative dose (1,633 +/- 1,266 micrograms/kg) than those presented also with a palpable mass (3,458 +/- 1,703 micrograms/kg), (p < 0.01). While in general there is a dose-related clinical toxicity, variability in the location of the hyperplasia can explain cases of no apparent obstruction despite large cumulative doses of PG. In asymptomatic cases the antral hyperplasia, although visualized, it did not result in gastric outlet obstruction. In all cases followed by us to date, discontinuation of the PG has resulted in resolution of the clinical and sonographic findings. Nasojejunal tube was successfully attempted in several cases, preventing surgery in these very-high-risk infants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevelopmental Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSame topicInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207