MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403668673 · doi:10.5737/1181912x173148151

The 2006 Helene Hudson Memorial Lectureship—How I learned what I thought I already knew

2007· article· en· W2403668673 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vivian G. Painter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvances in Oncology and Radiotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrivilege (computing)SoulPsychologyPsychoanalysisMedicinePhilosophyTheologyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, I experienced cancer from the other side: I have had the privilege of sharing the cancer experience with an intimate other. It was while I lived through this experience, this hand-in-hand, heart-to-heart and soul-by-soul walk with my husband that I really learned what I thought I already knew about how oncology nurses alleviate suffering, help heal and lessen the burden of the cancer illness. The purpose of this paper is to provide the oncology nurse with a portal into a lived experience of a person dying of cancer and to confirm what we do know, describe what we do not know and to lovingly challenge some of our assumptions so that we may become better students of our real teachers: our patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Oncology Nursing JournalSame topicAdvances in Oncology and RadiotherapyFrench-language works237,207