MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Character association and path co-efficient analysis in bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.).

2016· article· en· W2403783836 on OpenAlexaff
Gurleen Kaur Sidhu, Mamta Pathak

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultural Research Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMomordicaBitter gourdPath analysis (statistics)GermplasmPath coefficientHorticultureNon-invasive ventilationSugarForensic scienceYield (engineering)InsomniaBiologyGourdVeterinary medicineBotanyMathematicsTraditional medicineStatisticsMedicineFood science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The experiment was carried out with 58 germplasm lines of bitter gourd originating from different agro-ecological regions at the experimental area of the Department of Vegetable Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India to study character association and path analysis. The correlation coefficients were determined to find out the interrelationship among the characters studied. Yield/plant was found to be significantly correlated with days to last harvest (0.60, 0.70), fruit width (0.34, 0.41) and number of fruits per plant (0.57, 0.55) at both genotypic and phenotypic level which indicated that yield could be increased by selecting these characters. Direct and indirect effects were measured using path co-efficient analysis in order to determine the interrelationship between yield/plant and its components. From path analysis, it is evident that traits such as fruit length, fruit number, non reducing sugar imposed positive direct effect towards yield. Hence these characters may be considered as selection indices in bitter gourd improvement programme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgricultural Research JournalSame topicAdvances in Cucurbitaceae ResearchFrench-language works237,207