The Investigation of the Effect Women Employment on Rural Household Economic Decisions (A Case Study in Hendimini Rural District)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current study has been conducted with the aim of viewing the impact of out of house rural women employment on rural household economic. In this experimental done research, two group of women; employed ones as the experimental and the unemployed ones as the control group in a limited era were investigated to identify the influence of employment o the amount of participation and their own decision making power in rural household economics issues. In the present study 95 percent of the household women (employed or unemployed) participated in which 25 percent of the women were employed and the rest were unemployed. The results of the study reveal that there is a meaningful relationship between women employment and their decision making power in meeting the needs of household as well as in the field of rural household enterprise method, but there is no meaningful relationship between employment and marketing of rural household production. Also, the comparative studies of the hypothesis related to the employed and unemployed women and their own power of decision making in meeting rural basic needs, marketing and enterprise there was no significant difference between employed and un employed women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".