MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2403913515 · doi:10.1158/1557-3265.ovca15-b13

Abstract B13: Discovery of novel subtype-specific ovarian cancer biomarkers via integrated tissue proteomics.

2016· article· en· W2403913515 on OpenAlexaff
Felix Leung, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Blaise Clarke, Marjan Rouzbahman, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Vathany Kulasingam

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerous fluidBiomarker discoveryClear cellOvarian cancerSerous ovarian cancerProteomicsBiomarkerSerous CystadenomaEndometriosisProteomeCancerClear cell carcinomaComputational biologyMedicineBioinformaticsCancer researchBiologyCarcinomaPathologyInternal medicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction and Objectives: It is evident that ovarian cancer (OvCa) is not a single disease but is made up of several distinct subtypes, including serous, endometrioid, clear cell and mucinous. The gold-standard biomarker CA125 performs well in serous but not in the other histotypes. We hypothesize that a more focused discovery effort (on non-serous OvCa biomarkers and/or markers that can complement serum CA125) may bring about a sensitivity that is acceptable for all histotypes and be suitable for early diagnosis of OvCa. Methods: Tissues from patients diagnosed with endometrioid (EC), clear cell (CC), and mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MC), as well as from their appropriate controls (endometriosis and healthy endometrium for EC and CC; mucinous cystadenoma for MC) were subjected to proteomic analysis using a label-free, offline 2-dimensional liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry-based approach. Discovery candidates were then filtered using an in-house developed algorithm combining publicly-available resources with our own warehouse of transcriptomic and proteomic sets. Results and Discussion: Over 8000 unique proteins were identified in this proteomic exercise; specifically, approximately 1500 protein unique to MC, 1100 unique to CC, and 3000 unique to EC were identified when comparing the appropriate cases and controls. A curated list of 60 high-potential candidates was generated after using a range of bioinformatics tools to ensure criteria based on factors including (but not limited to) tissue specificity, cellular localization and transcriptional upregulation were met. These 60 candidates represent putative subtype-specific markers which will be further analyzed and validated in serum cohorts. Conclusions: The identification and validation of markers specific to the non-serous subtypes of OvCa remains an unmet clinical need. With our list of putative subtype-specific markers, we aim to develop a novel biomarker panel able to detect all OvCa histotypes with greater sensitivity and specificity than any existing clinical tools. Citation Format: Felix Leung, Marcus Q. Bernardini, Blaise Clarke, Marjan Rouzbahman, Eleftherios P. Diamandis, Vathany Kulasingam. Discovery of novel subtype-specific ovarian cancer biomarkers via integrated tissue proteomics. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B13.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207