MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Policies For Multi-Echelon Supply: Drp Systems With Probabilistic Time-Varying Demands

2003· article· en· W2403938602 on OpenAlex
Alain Martel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFOR Information Systems and Operational Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpeditingMathematical optimizationTime horizonComputer scienceSizingProbabilistic logicOperations researchSet (abstract data type)ProcurementMathematicsEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper develops rolling planning horizon policies to manage material flows in multi-echelon supply – distribution networks with relatively general stochastic demand processes and procurement, transportation, inventory and shortage cost structures. Initially, the problem is formulated as a stochastic program with recourse, and its deterministic equivalent program is approximated by a multi-echelon lot-sizing model based on “risk inflated effective demands.” A DRP – decomposition of this approximate model, which can he used with planning time fences or allocation algorithms, is then introduced. The use of expediting actions is also discussed. Finally, through a set of simulation experiments, the solutions obtained with our planning policies are compared with the solutions given by a classical DRP approach using safety stocks. The results show that the approach proposed leads to significant improvements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it