MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2404523947

Towards Semantic Integration of Legacy Databases for Homeland Security.

2005· article· en· W2404523947 on OpenAlexaff
Terry Janssen

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSemantic Web and Ontologies
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMetadataOntologyWorld Wide WebContext (archaeology)VocabularyDatabaseHomeland securitySemantic WebInformation retrieval
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sharing information between diverse heterogeneous databases and users has become one of the common goals of ontology-based systems (Musen, 1992; Gruber, 1993). Several commercial endeavors have been successful, such as Yahoo! with taxonomies for categorizing websites and Amazon.com for categorizing products, respectively. However, large legacy databases raise many challenges. The data base schemas are often poorly designed and the metadata is poorly documented. Rarely is there a standard vocabulary for describing entities. Ontology can be developed for databases, but mappings between legacy databases remains one of the grand challenges. This paper addresses some of these issues in context of homeland security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.516

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicSemantic Web and OntologiesFrench-language works237,207