MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

History and Recent Developments of Packaging Technology for SiC Power Devices

2016· article· en· W2404524715 on OpenAlexaff
Karl Otto Dohnke, Karsten Guth, Nicolas Heuck

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsInfineon Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon carbideMaterials sciencePackaging engineeringJunction temperaturePower semiconductor devicePower moduleElectronic packagingEngineering physicsPower (physics)Electrical engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Packaging plays an important role to allow the full potential of silicon carbide devices to be realised. The physical properties of silicon carbide will allow devices to operate with junction temperatures well above 200 °C, but today standard-packaged SiC products are limited to a maximum junction temperature of 175 °C. The limitation lies in the packaging, because a power device package is a complex structure consisting of many components of different materials and with correspondingly different thermal properties. As such, the assembly technologies define both the performance and lifetime of discrete packages and power modules. In this paper we give an insight of packaging technology for SiC devices from the beginning in the mid-1980s through to the state-of-the-art of today. In addition, new packaging technologies to enable power SiC devices to operate up to 200 °C are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207