MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2404706218 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30467-6

Associations of urinary sodium excretion with cardiovascular events in individuals with and without hypertension: a pooled analysis of data from four studies

2016· review· en· W2404706218 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityProvidence Health CarePopulation Health Research InstituteUniversité LavalHamilton Health Sciences
FundersFaculty of Community and Health Sciences, University of the Western CapeCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchIndependent University, BangladeshServierSerbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsUniwersytet Medyczny im. Piastów Slaskich we WroclawiuUniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaAstraZenecaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoMedical Research CouncilIndian Council of Medical ResearchHamilton Health SciencesSvenska Forskningsrådet FormasNational Research FoundationNorth-West UniversitySouth Africa Netherlands research Programme on Alternatives in DevelopmentPublic Health Agency of CanadaHamilton Health Sciences FoundationDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)McMaster UniversitySanofiVetenskapsrådetHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaUniversidad de La FronteraPublic Health AgencyGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsMedicineExcretionUrinary systemSodiumInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhysiologyUrologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it