An examination of the security implications of the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system in a mobile networked environment: An augmented vulnerability tree approach.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of carbon monoxide (CO) on the regional cerebral blood flow was studied by exposing lightly anesthetized rats for 30 min to 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0% CO gas mixtures. Cortical cerebral blood flow (CBF) increases of near 200%, 300%, and 400% control were observed at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5% CO, respectively; whereas at 2.0% CO a reversal of the CBF increase was observed with values declining to near 300% control. The CBF response of subcortical, cerebellar, and brain stem areas was quantitatively similar to that of cortex, indicating that the CBF changes in CO intoxication are general. The decrease in CBF at 2.0% CO was related to significant decreases in arterial CO2 tension. Comparison of the CBF data to previous metabolic results in CO poisoning suggests that the CBF increases are a principal factor in the maintenance of an intact energy state in CO poisoning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".