MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ATEN

2002· article· en· W2405165418 on OpenAlexafffundabout
WAYNE N.O. TURNBULL, DONALD L. MISENER, TIMOTHY J.N. SMITH, GUY R.J. ORAM, Reginald W. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsInternational Space StationSystems engineeringAeronauticsComputer scienceEngineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineeringAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the beginning of microgravity materials research, studies of diffusion in liquids have been performed as the typical research that efficiently uses the microgravity environment. Successful experiments in microgravity have demonstrated the ability of the Canadian Microgravity Program (QUEST I, QUELDs I and II) to make significant contributions to this field of international microgravity research. Recently, Millenium Biologix was selected to develop and build the advanced thermal environment facility (ATEN) for the International Space Station. The design of this new processing facility builds on the considerable experience gained in designing and building the QUELD II furnace and developing sealed samples for use on board a manned space platform. The system requirements for ATEN are presented, along with preliminary test data from a prototype furnace.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2240.119

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the New York Academy of SciencesSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207