MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405180488 · doi:10.5072/zenodo.243160

Additions and Improvements in the ACE 2.0 Music Classifier.

2009· article· en· W2405180488 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica Thompson, Cory McKay, John Burgoyne, Ichiro Fujinaga

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceClassifier (UML)XMLMachine learningSoftwareData miningArtificial intelligenceDimensionality reductionPattern recognition (psychology)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

music.mcgill.ca This paper presents additions and improvements to the Autonomous Classification Engine (ACE), a framework for using and optimizing classifiers. Given a set of feature values, ACE experiments with a variety of classifiers, classifier parameters, classifier ensembles and dimensionality-reduction techniques in order to arrive at a configuration that is well-suited to a given problem. Changes and additions have been made to ACE in order to increase its functionality as well as to make it easier to use and incorporate into other software frameworks. Details are provided on ACE’s remodeled class structure and associated API, the improved command line and graphical user interfaces, a new ACE XML 2.0 ZIP file format and expanded statistical reporting associated with cross validation. The resulting improved processing and methods of operation are also discussed. 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.216

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.057

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusic and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207