MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405185286 · doi:10.1177/1591019915617324

Flow diverter placement for management of dissecting ruptured aneurysm in a non-fused basilar artery

2015· article· en· W2405185286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterventional Neuroradiology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubarachnoid hemorrhageAneurysmBasilar arteryVertebral arteryPseudoaneurysmDissection (medical)Flow diverterStentRadiologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intracranial vertebral artery dissection can be associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and pseudoaneurysm formation. Dissecting aneurysms have a high risk of rebleeding in the acute phase. To our knowledge, the management of an acute vertebrobasilar junction dissecting aneurysm associated with a basilar non-fusion has not been previously reported. We report here a case of SAH due to rupture of a dissecting aneurysm involving the vertebrobasilar junction and extending to involve the right limb and proximal junction of a non-fused basilar artery, managed by insertion of a flow-diverting stent with excellent clinical outcome and long-term patency of the flow diverter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it