MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405229220 · doi:10.1093/milmed/167.suppl_1.2

Immunofluorescence Detection of Radiation-Induced DNA Base Damage

2002· article· en· W2405229220 on OpenAlexaff
James Z. Xing, Jane Lee, Steven A. Leadon, X. Chris Le, Michael Weinfeld

Bibliographic record

VenueMilitary Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapillary electrophoresisThymineDNAMolecular biologyChemistryDNA damageFluorescenceChromatographyBiologyBiochemistryPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We previously described a sensitive assay for measuring thymine glycol in the DNA of irradiated cells. The assay combines immunorecognition of the DNA lesion with capillary electrophoresis and laser-fluorescence detection to achieve an absolute detection level in the zeptomole (10(-21) mol) range. This article describes modifications to the protocol that overcome certain technical problems seen with the original methodology. In particular, the capillary electrophoresis is carried out at pH 8.3 rather than pH 10.5. The new protocol was used to examine removal of thymine glycol from the DNA of A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells and resting lymphocytes after exposure to 2 Gy gamma rays. Both cell types displayed similar repair kinetics. Removal of thymine glycol is almost complete at 4 hours postirradiation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMilitary MedicineSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207