MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2405478812 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.fbcr15-ia10

Abstract IA10: The role of stem cells in the origin of relapse in acute leukemia

2016· article· en· W2405478812 on OpenAlexaff
John E. Dick

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSomatic evolution in cancerCancer stem cellStem cellEpigeneticsBiologyGenetic heterogeneityCancerLeukemiaCancer researchGeneticsGenePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The cellular and molecular basis for intra-tumoral heterogeneity is poorly understood. Tumor cells can be genetically diverse due to mutations and clonal evolution resulting in intra-tumoral functional heterogeneity. Often proposed as mutually exclusive, cancer stem cell (CSC) models postulate that tumors are cellular hierarchies created due to epigenetic programs that are sustained by CSC. I will focus on three lines of evidence showing these models are highly integrated. Gene signatures specific to either AML LSC or normal HSC are highly similar and define a common stemness program. Compared to non-stem cell transcriptional programs, only stem cell signatures were significant independent predictors of patient survival in 4 large clinical databases of >1000 samples. Thus, determinants of stemness influence clinical outcome of AML across a spectrum of mutations indicating that many genetic abnormalities coalesce around stem cell properties. Secondly, we have carried out a series of combined genetic and functional studies of the LSC from either B-ALL or AML that point to commonalities between clonal evolution and CSC models of cancer. LSC from diagnostic patient samples were genetically diverse and reconstruction of their genetic ancestry showed that multiple LSC subclones were related through a complex branching evolutionary process and specific genetic events influence L-IC frequency. Also study of paired diagnostic (Dx) and relapse (Rx) samples are revealing that individual subclones possess distinct functional growth properties and that rare Dx subclones are chemotherapy resistant and become enriched at Rx. Thus the clonal evolution models are highly relevant in cancer but need to be extended to adopt the concept that CSC are subject to clonal evolutionary forces. Finally, the combined genetic and functional analysis of AML is revealing fundamental insights into the cell of origin, nature and biological consequences of initiating lesions and order of subsequent mutations; concepts that demonstrate how highly integrated the CSC and genetic evolution models must be. Highly purified hematopoietic stem cells (HSC), progenitor and mature cell fractions from the blood of AML patients were found to contain recurrent DNMT3a mutations (DNMT3amut) at high allele frequency, but without coincident NPM1 mutations (NPM1c) present in AML blasts. DNMT3amut-bearing HSC exhibited multilineage repopulation advantage over non-mutated HSC in xenografts, establishing their identity as pre-leukemic-HSC (preL-HSC). preL-HSC were found in remission samples indicating that they survive chemotherapy. Thus DNMT3amut arises early in AML evolution, likely in HSC, leading to a clonally expanded pool of preL-HSC from which AML evolves. For therapy to be more effective, our findings indicate that each genetic subclones must be targeted and that any cells that possess stemness properties, whether they are LSC or ancestral preL-HSC, must also be eradicated. Citation Format: John E. Dick. The role of stem cells in the origin of relapse in acute leukemia. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research; 2015 Oct 23-26; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(3 Suppl):Abstract nr IA10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→