Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo examina el desarrollo de dos endencias iconográficas de las imágenes de la Celestina y la maja en el arte del siglo XIX, ambas establecidas por Goya: la satírica, que a menudo se expresa en medios impresos y que muestra la prostitución como comercio entre seres humanos, conectándola a otros fenómenos sociales, como el matrimonio forzado y los pordioseros; y la sentimental o pintoresca, que a menudo usa el medio pictórico para visiones idealizadas o sensuales de la maja. Leonardo Alenza y Nieto (1807-1845) desarrolla la mirada crítica que Goya posa sobre la prostitución al incorporar figuras masculinas marginales en sus cuadros, retratando las relaciones entre las prostitutas, sus clientes, los pordioseros e incluso la prostitución masculina. Eugenio Lucas Velázquez (1817-1870) pintó durante un periodo en el que la prostitución estaba legalizada y bajo vigilancia médica al ejercerse en burdeles controlados por el estado. Este pintor se aleja de la tradición sentimental para presentar a las majas como víctimas de celestinas bestializadas o como meras figuras folclóricas atractivas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".