User‐Interactive and Wireless‐Communicating RF Textiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents user‐interactive and wireless‐communicating radio‐frequency (RF) textiles made from glass–metal–polymer composite fibers that interact with the user through touch‐sensing and that relays the touch data through IEEE 802.15.4 and Bluetooth protocols at 2.4 GHz frequency. This work integrates several textile functionalities in fiber‐form including capacitive touch sensing, electrical interconnects, and 2.4 GHz wireless communications using submillimeter glass–metal–polymer composite fibers imbedded into the textile host. Tests conducted with these user‐interactive RF textiles have shown that the emissive performance in terms of radiation pattern, gain, and signal strength adequately address short‐range wireless communications applications in compliance with Bluetooth protocols, and that the user‐interaction is enabled through capacitive finger‐touch sensing with a 1 ms time response. This approach demonstrates that glass‐fiber textiles can be adequately designed for user‐interactive and wireless communications applications addressing 2.4 GHz frequency bands while preserving the mechanical and cosmetic properties of the garments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".