MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2405928442 · doi:10.32112/2174.2464.2014.110

El slam en Quebec: De práctica social a objeto de enseñanza

2014· article· en· W2405928442 on OpenAlex
Judith Émery-­Bruneau, Valérie Yobé

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuee-rph (University of Granada) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObject (grammar)SociologySocial practiceHumanitiesPoetryExploratory researchHistorySocial scienceArtLinguisticsLiteraturePhilosophyArt historyPerformance art

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Slam has democratized poetry, allowing all interested individuals to express themselves as well as see, listen, and evaluate other slammers on stage. Given slam as a genre is also contributing to the development of literacy skills in extra-scholarly and scholarly contexts, it is important for us to understand its characteristics. We, therefore, conducted a study on the social and scholarly practices of slam in Quebec. In this article, we will present the results of an exploratory research, which was aimed to analyze the discourse, the signs, and codes of slam as a social practice as well as to understand how this practice evolves into a teaching object (objet enseigné).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it