MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406097656 · doi:10.3917/cdle.041.0241

Une exposition « clés en main » : la difficile prise en compte des apprentissages dans le partenariat scolaire

2016· article· fr· W2406097656 on OpenAlex
Julien Netter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCarrefours de l éducation · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le partenariat entre les acteurs de l’éducation connaît un nouveau développement avec la réforme des rythmes scolaires, symptomatique de l’adoption du paradigme de l’« éclectisme éclairé » au sein du système scolaire français. L’observation d’une sortie au musée extraite d’une enquête ethnographique d’orientation sociologique dans les écoles parisiennes montre que les pratiques et modes d’organisation divergents des acteurs les conduisent à mettre en œuvre des formes de coopération très contraintes. Ils semblent privilégier les conditions de réalisation du partenariat et la préservation d’un équilibre fragile au sein de l’école sur les modalités d’appropriation des expériences culturelles. Dès lors, certains élèves, souvent issus de milieux populaires, peinent à articuler la classe avec leurs différentes expériences culturelles et à retirer un bénéfice de leur synthèse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it