MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406137460

Integrating SSD Caching into Database Systems.

2014· article· en· W2406137460 on OpenAlexaff
Xin Liu, Kenneth Salem

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Data(base) Engineering Bulletin · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCachePage cacheCache algorithmsCache pollutionCache coloringCache invalidationSmart CacheOperating systemWrite bufferDatabaseParallel computingCPU cache
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flash-based solid state storage devices (SSDs) are now becoming commonplace in server environments. In this paper, we consider the use of SSDs as a persistent second-tier cache for database systems. We argue that it is desirable to change the behavior of the database system’s buffer cache when a second-tier SSD cache is used, so that the buffer cache is aware of which pages are in the SSD cache. We propose such an SSD-aware buffer cache manager, called GD2L. An interesting side effect of SSD-aware buffer cache management is that the rate with which a page will be evicted or written from the buffer cache will change when that page is moved into or out of the second-tier SSD cache. We also propose a technique, called CAC, for managing the contents of the second-tier cache. CAC is aware that moving pages into or out of the SSD cache will change their physical read and write rates. It anticipates these changes when making decisions about which pages to cache at the second tier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Data(base) Engineering BulletinSame topicAdvanced Data Storage TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207