MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406269440 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2016.2570698

Improving Efficiency Through Adaptive Internal Model Control of Hydrogen-Based Genset Used as a Range Extender for Electric Vehicles

2016· article· en· W2406269440 on OpenAlexafffund
Lamoussa Jacques Kere, Sousso Kélouwani, Kodjo Agbossou, Yves Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringController (irrigation)PowertrainRange (aeronautics)Computer scienceBattery (electricity)Electric powerDriving rangePower (physics)Control theory (sociology)EngineeringTorqueControl (management)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses a hydrogen-based generator (genset) adaptive control used as a range extender of a battery electric vehicle. Based on a commercially available gasoline genset, this hydrogen-based generator can use a mixture of gasoline and hydrogen in which the proportion of gasoline varies between 0% and 100%. This hybrid energy system is controlled by an onboard energy management system that splits the electric power demand between the battery and the genset. Given the genset power profile, a maximum efficiency tracking module was designed to provide optimal operating conditions (engine speed and electric power) to a real-time controller. To tackle the genset nonlinearities, an adaptive controller based on the internal model control approach is designed and successfully validated. In addition, a comparative study with an industrial-based control method indicates that the proposed approach is effective and can achieve significant improvement in genset efficiency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.713
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207