Vers la diffusion d'itinéraires adaptés, adaptables et adaptatifs pour des personnes à mobilité réduite
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a part of research work carried out within MobiliSIGprojectwhich aimsto design and developamult imodalmobiletechnology for helpingpeople with disabilities to navigate in Quebe c City (Canada) asexperimentation location.MobiliSIG project focuses on building an a ccessibility database based on environmental factors and personal factors of peopl e with disabilities. The works done in the framework of this article aim to define adapted, ada ptable and adaptive itineraries related to multi-user, multiplatform, multimodal (user interfa ces) and multi-environment contexts. Here,we willdefine severalscenarios which will allow us to identify different desired representations of the itinerary and to propose an architecture for their communicationthrough the web. MOTS -CLES :Diffusion web, itineraire,multimodalite, appareils mobiles, mobilite reduite, fauteuil roulant, accessibilite
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it