MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406834122

Network Gyre - Exercising the Network's Rhythmic Potential

2015· article· en· W2406834122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ethan Cayko

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic Technology and Sound Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOcean gyreRhythmComputer sciencePhysicsFisheryBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study centers on an exploration of latency inherent in long-distance networked music performance as well as its application in the performance of "Network Gyre", a work written for bi-located percussion.The research examines time delays in two ways: 1) by creating a series of exercises used to familiarize performers with the nature of network latency and 2) by providing an example of highly rhythmic music written for the network.Notational methods used by composers such as Steve Reich and John Cage are used to address communication and rhythmic challenges in network music.Finally, a description of the extra-musical applications and formal structure of "Network Gyre" is provided.The research was made possible through numerous meetings between researchers at the University of Calgary and Dr. Kenneth Fields and percussionist Feng Piaoyang at the Central Conservatory of Music in Beijing in the fall of 2014.We utilized the research network Cybera to establish a high-speed connection and the program Artsmesh as an interface for connecting audio between sites.The outcome was a performance of "Network Gyre" and a series of exercises that display the characteristics of networked performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Abraham Lincoln AssociationSame topicMusic Technology and Sound StudiesFrench-language works237,207