MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2406976833 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2016.7471790

An adaptive multi-level wavelet denoising method for 40-Hz ASSR

2016· article· en· W2406976833 on OpenAlexaff
Sahar Javaher Haghighi, Wael Louis, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Hossam El‐Beheiry

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletNoise reductionWavelet packet decompositionComputer scienceWavelet transformNoise (video)Pattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial intelligenceSpeech recognitionMathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method for extracting auditory steady state response (ASSR) signals from background electroencephalogram. 40-Hz ASSR signals are sensitive to subject's state of consciousness and can be used as a monitor for the depth of anaesthesia. The suggested method is a multilevel adaptive wavelet denoising scheme that extracts ASSR cycles faster than the currently used averaging schemes and can monitor depth of anesthesia with minimum delay. It estimates the variance of noise and adapts the threshold at each denoising level. The algorithm benefits from the fact that wavelet transform preserves temporality and takes into consideration the correlation of the neighbor wavelet coefficients. Our method extracts ASSR from small number of epochs in a short time moreover, it does not neglect the variations of the signal from one epoch to the other and outperforms averaging. The performance of the proposed scheme is evaluated on the synthetic and on real data recorded during induction of anaesthesia ASSR signals in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207