MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407020479

Business Models and Strategies of M-Commerce: A Review

2015· review· en· W2407020479 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fahad Mehmood

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBusiness modelFocus (optics)Perspective (graphical)Empirical evidenceEmpirical researchNew business developmentArtifact-centric business process modelData scienceKnowledge managementBusiness process modelingBusiness processBusinessMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this paper is on reviewing business models in the literature from the mobile network operator (MNO) perspective; observing the strategic decisions made by companies and discussing the possibility of a standard in m-commerce business model that can emerge in the near future. This paper analyses theoretical and empirical evidence of business models and strategies across the world. Results indicate that the focus of business models has shifted towards value net approach with customer at the core and all the other players in value chain encircling it, forming relationships to obtain win-win situations. Empirical evidence from authors belonging to various geographical locations across the world will provide an insight of market trends and behavior in those particular regions. This study can provide a reference and aims to fill the void in literature regarding business model and strategies as it is important to focus on business aspects of m-commerce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Internet Banking and CommerceSame topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207