Comparison of Workflow, Maintenance, and Consumables in the GeneXpert Infinity 80 and Panther Instruments While Testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The 2015 Sexually Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) using nucleic acid amplification tests, and prompt treatment of infected persons on site under direct observation. Faster time to results may enable treatment and management outcomes. METHODS: Workflow parameters for processing 1, 10, 48, 96, and 192 tests were determined in the GeneXpert Infinity 80 (Cepheid) and Panther (Hologic) instruments. RESULTS: In an Xpert CT/NG cartridge, the time to first results on the Infinity 80 was 1 hour 30 minutes for single or multiple tests and final results for 10, 48, 96, and 192 tests were available at 1 hour 37 minutes, 1 hour 54 minutes, 3 hour 17 minutes, and 5 hour 7 minutes, respectively. With the Aptima CT/GC assay on the Panther, the respective times were 3 hr 45 min for the first test result, and 3 hour 51 minutes, 4 hour 38 minutes, 5 hour 26 minutes, and 7 hour 4 minutes to final results. The Panther required more time for maintenance and consumed a greater variety of plastics and reagents but required less hands-on time when testing larger numbers of specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The Infinity 80 is a versatile instrument for continuous random access testing of small or large numbers of clinical specimens and may provide diagnostic results, in some settings, in time for treatment of CT and NG infections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".