MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407374313 · doi:10.3917/bupsy.542.0117

La compréhension de l’intention d’autrui est-elle sous l’influence d’un biais négatif ?

2016· article· fr· W2407374313 on OpenAlexaff
Virginie Laval, Virginie Dardier, Cécile Laval

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de psychologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche visait à déterminer les stratégies mises en œuvre par les adultes pour attribuer un état psychologique du locuteur dans des situations de communication, où plusieurs indices, porteurs de valence émotionnelle, s’opposent : se fondent-ils sur les indices (contexte vs prosodie) ou sur la valence émotionnelle de l’indice (positive vs négative). Cinquante adultes ont participé à une épreuve informatisée de complétement d’histoires, qui variaient en fonction du contexte (joyeux, triste) et de la prosodie (triste, joyeuse). Les résultats démontaient une stratégie fondée sur la valence émotionnelle des indices, et l’existence d’un biais négatif.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de psychologieSame topicLanguage, Metaphor, and CognitionFrench-language works237,207