Evaporated Nanostructured Y<sub>2</sub> O<sub>3</sub>:Eu Thin Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Europium-doped yttrium oxide (Y2O3:Eu) is a well-known luminescent material that in recent years has been studied in thin-film form. However, to date there has not been a great effort put into altering the nanostructure of these films. A thin-film deposition technique called glancing angle deposition allows for a high degree of control over the nanostructure of the thin film, resulting in thin films with nanostructure geometries ranging from chevron and post to helix. Glancing-angle deposition was used to make europium-doped yttrium oxide thin films with slanted-post nanostructures. Portions of the films were annealed in air at 850 degrees C for 10 hours following deposition. Scanning electron microscopy was used to characterize the nanostructures of the films, while UV laser excitation was used to characterize the photoluminescence properties of the films. The annealed samples exhibited increased photoluminescent responses compared to unannealed samples; however, the porous nanoscale geometry of the films was unaffected. In order to optimize the photoluminescence properties of the films, both the partial pressure of oxygen during film deposition and the level of europium doping in the source material used were varied. Films fabricated from the source material with a greater amount of europium doping had larger photoluminescent responses, while the optimal partial pressure of oxygen during electron-beam evaporation was found to be less than 1.0 x 10(-4) torr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".