MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407462674

The hypergraph of θ-classes and θ-graphs of partial cubes.

2014· article· en· W2407462674 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Boštjan Brešar, Tadeja Kraner Šumenjak

Bibliographic record

VenueArs Combinatoria · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChordal graphCombinatoricsMathematicsHypergraphInterval graphPathwidthIndifference graphSplit graphDiscrete mathematicsVertex (graph theory)GraphLine graph1-planar graph
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a partial cube G, the Θ-graph of G has Θ-classes of G as its vertices, and two vertices in it are adjacent if the corresponding Θ-classes meet in a vertex of G. We present a counter-example to the question from [8] whether Θ-graphs of graphs of acyclic cubical complexes are always dually chordal graphs. On a positive side, we show that in the class of ACC pexpansion graphs each Θ-graph is both a dually chordal and a chordal graph. In the proof a fundamental characterization of α-acyclic hypergraphs is combined with techniques from metric graph theory. Along the way, we also introduce a new, weaker version of simplicial elimination scheme which yields yet another characterization of chordal graphs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArs CombinatoriaSame topicAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207