MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407520746

GENCOL : Une équipe et un logiciel d'optimisation

2010· article· fr· W2407520746 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jacques Desrosiers

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia informatica universalis · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftwareLibrary scienceHumanitiesComputer scienceArtOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we report the story of the GENCOL team and of the optimization software of the same name. This is first of all the history of a collaboration that has lasted for thirty years between Francois Soumis and Jacques Desrosiers, HEC Montreal and Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, the research centers CRT and GERAD, and the spin off companies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.008
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudia informatica universalisSame topicConstraint Satisfaction and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207