MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407600613 · doi:10.1385/0-89603-258-2:389

Production of <SUP>35</SUP>S-Labeled Proteins in E. coli and Their Use as Molecular Probes

2003· review· en· W2407600613 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Lydan, Danton H. O’Day

Bibliographic record

VenueHumana Press eBooks · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAurora CollegeUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterologousHeterologous expressionProtein expressionBiochemistryChemistryEscherichia coliMolecular biologyProtein biosynthesisBiologyCell biologyRecombinant DNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ability to obtain essentially unrestricted quantities of a cloned protein via expression in a bacterial, fungal, or eukaryotic cell expression system facilitates the structural and functional characterization of that protein. The rapidly increasing availability of diverse expression vectors and complementary cellular systems will eventually allow for the heterologous expression of any protein (1-3). Heterologous protein expression with concomitant radiolabeling provides an attractive means to produce a readily detectable, biochemically active form of the protein without the potential chemical modifications that may arise when a radioactive or other detectable marker is covalently linked to it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHumana Press eBooksSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207