MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407614142

[Medical and ecological evaluation of mercury hazards to the population of the Irkutsk region].

2002· article· en· W2407614142 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Efimova Nv, Rukavishnikov Vs

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Resources and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMercury (programming language)Environmental scienceSewagePopulationPollutionWater pollutantsEnvironmental hazardWater pollutionEnvironmental chemistryEcologyEnvironmental healthEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental protectionBiologyChemistryMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pollution of the Angara river with the waste water of chemical production has led to mercury accumulation in the ecological water system. Potential human hazard is associated with mercury cumulation in marketable fishes. The maximum levels of mercury were 1.5-4.0. Dietary mercury intake has been confirmed by that the toxic agent is present in the biological substrates of the rural population in amounts greater than the baseline values. An attempt has been made to predict the development of a situation by means of the logical model developed by the data of monitoring in Japan and Canada. The period of formation of a focus of ecologically caused mercurialness is estimated to be 100-200 years after the onset of sewage discharge into the water reservoir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicWater Resources and ManagementFrench-language works237,207