MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2407667407 · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000537

Challenges of Change

2015· editorial· en· W2407667407 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mark McRae, Matthew McRae, Antonio J. Forte

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Plastic Surgery · 2015
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiversity and Career in Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLibrary scienceSuiteFamily medicineArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From the *Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; and †The Buncke Medical Clinic, San Francisco, CA. Received February 7, 2015, and accepted for publication, after revision, March 16, 2015. Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared. Reprints: Antonio Jorge Forte, MD, The Buncke Medical Clinic, 45 Castro Street, Suite 121, San Francisco, CA 94114. Email: [email protected].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0100.011
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0150.029
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.394
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.002 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Plastic SurgerySame topicDiversity and Career in MedicineFrench-language works237,207